Assimilating Evil:
23. DE NUPTIIS MYSTICIS. (On the Mystical Marriage)
O my Son, how wonderful is the Wisdom of this Law of Love! How vast are the Oceans of uncharted Joy that lie before the Keel of thy Ship! Yet know this, that every Opposition is in its Nature named Sorrow, and the Joy lieth in the Destruction of the Dyad. Therefore, must thou seek ever those Things which are to thee poisonous, and that in the highest Degree, and make them thine by Love. That which repels, that which disgusts, must thou assimilate in this Way of Wholeness. Yet rest not in the Joy of the Destruction of each complex in thy Nature, but press on to that ultimate Marriage with the Universe whose Consummation shall destroy thee utterly, leaving only that Nothingness which was before the Beginning.
So then the Life of Non-Action is not for thee; the Withdrawal from Activity is not the Way of the Tao; but rather the Intensification and making universal every Unit of thine Energy on every Plane.
Liber Aleph: Aleister Crowley-
It can be said that most people consider themselves moral. Sometimes morality is given to us by religion, in some cases prejudice not entirely distinct from that found in religion. Sometimes morality rises out of fear or cowardice. Whatever the source of morality, the idea of right and wrong action, it does exactly what has just been illustrated, it imagines the world of contraries being a type of divine injunction that we must adhere to as if the source of creation stands in opposition to the cause of negation. It establishes the demiurge as the highest. The way to see past this limited perception is to look past the world of contraries, to the Dyad and beyond to Kether even to Naught, at least in acknowledgement of these respective positions on the tree of life as having given birth to creation as we know it.
The morality of most people clouds their judgement, even leading them away from the ultimate truth, that there is no good or evil and that their god is an inversion of the truth created from the limited perspective inherent in the very nature of humanity, as a reflection of the world of illusion. This is a very liberal use of the term, as to us the illusion is very real, and since the illusion is so real, and to so many people, it may be that transcending duality is the true illusion. Be that as it may, it is a lovely thought: the idea of universal oneness or universal brotherhood united in what is called agape. There are perhaps certain characteristics, magickal powers associated with the realization of the all, and one having been raised to such heights’ inability to accept it as anything less than the highest truth referring to our existence as Maya, might serve as proof lending credence to the idea that our very existence is what has led most of us astray and away from that which is truly divine. Henceforth, as stated in the above quote, we are to transcend this world of duality by proactively uniting all opposites, but for what, to what end, and who does it benefit?
Crowley tells us that the Universal Marriage is an experience that will destroy one utterly, making the whole thing seem freakishly masochistic, and again, who does it benefit when one is turned into a pile of dust in the end? Perhaps it isn’t meant to benefit anybody. Perhaps it is an unquenchable thirst for finding the hidden truth behind the nature of existence, or perhaps, one does, in fact, obtain magickal powers that could darken the skies and move mountains. Who knows…? Crowley knew, and according to him so did a few other people, most notably Madam Blavatsky. Especially notable too, are the people in modern history who were able to attain these insights according to Crowley, could not have been, by any stretch of the imagination, called moralists in the strict sense of the word. Although, in all their writings from Blavatsky and in particular Nietzsche comes to mind, they seemed to have a had deep love for humanity and an ability to see past the inherent evils and find the goodness in the soul of humankind. That for all his ideas about good and evil, Nietzsche was perhaps trying to point this out to us, that at our most essential core we are united, and that our differences are but petty misunderstandings, that every individual has his and her place to occupy without the need for any of it to change. Perhaps it wasn’t implied consciously, but in my mind, for any individual to write such an extensive commentary on the human condition, there must also be present a profound love and acceptance for the same.
Just as easily as I can learn to enjoy and love a sunrise as much as I do a sunset, doing the same with the opposites found within my nature may present with equal ease as inquiring into the reason that I prefer night to day or sleep to wakefulness, as long as I am left alone to do so. But we live in a world populated by other human beings, wherein this pursuit is made more difficult owing to the unique qualities of every individual and the intricate problems we face in understanding the motivations of others and the human psyche. So, now we must learn to accept these things, even things that we are averse to, assimilating these ideas to the point of union—love, all the while as these people who we set out to understand and unite with are prone to conflict as if lost in their world of contraries without the slightest desire to change their perspectives and see it from our point of view. Their need to contend is a frustration, they debase themselves as unworthy of understanding in the pursuit of such a holy cause, as if one is better off an anthropologist than a magician, especially when their indifference leads to conflict and petty behaviors fueled by morality, that ever so often threaten the safety and security of one’s life and possessions. It seems that the game is lost from the start; as we are all human and we are all prone to a spectrum of emotions and feelings such as anger and resentment meant to deal with these contending forces we are surrounded by: feelings and emotions that have nothing in common with love and what we are trying to achieve.
The aforementioned is a misnomer, we are not trying to change the world, it is what it is: war is still war, and conflict is here to stay; it is the nature of the Universe, of Humanity and of Nature herself. We are to assimilate these into ourselves, we must learn to love, to accept and to find the beauty in the uncomfortable and the grotesque, the violent and the vulgar: to be drawn to those natures that we are by instinct averse too. To hate is not to assimilate, yes, we do hate, and for good reason, but this is contrary to our way of life and plays into the moralist perspective—the very position we are trying to avoid. It seems that some things then, may be unified by understanding one’s relationship to those things and the nature of the inherent prejudice towards anything in question. While others must be united with sensually as well, via experience, thus violence may be experienced over and over until one falls in love with violence or at least until the apprehension to partake in such acts ceases. The same will be true for most sensual activities, so if I am repulsed by a certain sight, to assimilate it does not only mean to expose myself to it over and over, but to inquire into the nature of the aversion, whereby exploring my complexes intellectually may expose them as irrational. This is a way of uncovering the character of the elements confined to the shadow, and by understanding, accepting and eventually learning to love those behaviors and affinities that we were in the past averse to, a greater love and understanding develops, not only for humanity as a whole but for oneself.
What makes this task so difficult then is mankind’s reverence for conflict, not the conflict itself, but the justification, that conflict is necessary according to the Moola or the Christian by divine orders. That they tend to commit themselves to an imaginary war, an abstraction, perhaps founded in man’s need to protect the tribe from being bastardized by those foreigners; and so, they prayed for protection. Once they had overcome the enemy their God was born: a God particularly fond of bloodshed and war and so, here we stand today, still under the sway of a tyrant envisioned by little more than a primate. The mystic minded of the lot retreated into the forest and found himself in a cave where he raised a mermaid from whom he was offered divine insights. Hence, after many years he returned home, to the tribe, and having awakened his own inner Genius gave them politics, or morality and a code of conduct for them to attain to ever greater heights of power, all in the name of a god: thus upon his return home he was drawn back into their pigsty and took on the role of moral leader or a politician. Now those of us who are interested in the prospect of seeing God face to face, without the hindrance of primitive morality, just the knowledge that love is what binds us all together, and you are okay as long as you feel the same way about me, are still facing the morality of the same aforementioned immature God, constantly under threat of being pulled right back into the kennel.
This God would never have existed if the notion of a tribe didn’t exist, but then a tribe wouldn’t have existed if we didn’t as humans have son’s and daughters, so we may as well blame humanity, and say we are in fact, attempting to transcend human nature. Thus, the appeal is made even more daunting as we are negating the very thing to which we owe incarnation, our humanity. This transcendence is achieved by looking at all the ugliness and all the beauty, an activity that once a magician has taken his Oath will be rather forthcoming, as if now these things are deliberately shown to him. All the pain and all the pleasure, all the uncomfortableness and joy must be assimilated entirely, without preference and prejudice to widen the circumference of experience, until finally, union with Man-Soul is attained.
Therefore, the above vignette is saying that we must assimilate by activity every opposite, and that all of these are realized as elements of our own beings. That they are not foreign and that the work is internal, utilizing and studying the different parts of the Self to gain a deeper connection to the All. These aversions are subjective, and we know they are as there are humans who are perfectly happy to joyously partake in things that I am repulsed by. Hence my repulsion is in question, what makes me think I am in any way different or special and separate from the Soul of Humanity, what is it that repulses me, not the thing, but owing to my complexes. Do I not also have a similar constitution, are we not all united by the same Spirit, the L.V.X. issuing forth from the highest and that which animates us into existence, that upon realization we become one with the All.